November 4, 2007
What determines whether radiography or ultrasonic in used ?
The important of the work. Usually radiography is sufficient for thin hulls. Where thicker materials are used for important fabrications and full penetration welds employed in both butts and tee butts, then ultrasonics would be used firs, followed by radiography. This is because ultrasonics will detect almost all of the defects (except those which lie in the same plane as the path of the sound beam) and give the location of them.
Radiography is complementary to ultrasonic testing, indicating those defects which would not be picked up by ultrasonics and giving a permanent record on film of the area examined. For welds such as tee butt joints radiography is not possible. In such a case, ultrasonic testing is solely employed and then technique devised to cover the whole weld and heat affected zone area.
How much non-destructive testing is necessary ?
The degree of inspection will be specified by the designer and may be above the minimum required by the classification societies. The builder will also want to ensure weld quality. Unsatisfactory workmanship can be corrected in the early stages of construction, thus avoiding repairs to welds at a later date which cannot be made without undoing work already done.
Where would magnetic or dye penetrant testing be used ?
These two process reveal surface defects or cracks that have come to the surface. Dye penetrant testing requires a reasonably smooth surface because of the dye which, on a rough surface, would give spurious results. Magnetic crack detection would therefore be used for normal undressed welded surfaces, and applied to compartment boundary welds, return welds around stiffener endings, cope holes, corner welds and any other important structural welds that cannot be radiographed or ultrasonically tested.